|
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
+1 binding.
I'm very happy to see cdEvents reach this point and I want to thank everyone who put effort into this.
/Fatih
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
Oliver Nocon
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Oleg Nenashev via lists.cd.foundation
Sent: Freitag, 26. November 2021 15:32
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
|
|
|
Tracy Ragan
+1 non-binding for me. Glad to see this getting off the ground.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 10:00 AM Oliver Nocon via lists.cd.foundation <oliver.nocon=sap.com@...> wrote:
+1 non-binding
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Oleg Nenashev via lists.cd.foundation
Sent: Freitag, 26. November 2021 15:32
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
-- Kind Regards,
Tracy Ragan CEO and Co-Founder / DeployHub / tel: + 1.505.424.6440/ mob: +1.505.780.0558 We make microservices easy.
|
|
|
Kara de la Marck
|
|
|
Dan Lorenc <lorenc.d@...>
|
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
Melissa McKay
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
Andrea Frittoli
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
+ 1 binding
Regards
Peng Li
From: <cdf-toc@...> on behalf of Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@...>
Date: Friday, November 26, 2021 at 10:32 PM
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
This message came from outside your organization.
|
|
|
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
|
|
|
Dear all,
We have 6 binding votes in different threads. It's a majority needed for accepting the project. Taking the general support from the CDF TOC meeting participants and the CD Events SIG, I intend to proceed with calling the vote completed on Dec 01, noon UTC if there is no major concerns requiring additional review by the TOC. Any feedback will be appreciated!
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:50 PM Jason Hall < jasonhall@...> wrote: +1 binding
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:16 PM Peng QL Li < lplpli@...> wrote:
+ 1 binding
Regards
Peng Li
From: <cdf-toc@...> on behalf of Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@...>
Date: Friday, November 26, 2021 at 10:32 PM
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
Dear all, At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating
project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
This message came from outside your organization.
|
|
|
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
|
|
|
Dear all,
Based on many +1 votes and absence of negative feedback or unaddressed concerns, I think we can conclude the voting. Please welcome CD Events to the Continuous Delivery Foundation as an incubating project! Thanks to all CD Events SIG contributors for driving it!
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 6:33 PM Oleg Nenashev via lists.cd.foundation <o.v.nenashev=gmail.com@...> wrote:
Dear all,
We have 6 binding votes in different threads. It's a majority needed for accepting the project. Taking the general support from the CDF TOC meeting participants and the CD Events SIG, I intend to proceed with calling the vote completed on Dec 01, noon UTC if there is no major concerns requiring additional review by the TOC. Any feedback will be appreciated!
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:50 PM Jason Hall < jasonhall@...> wrote: +1 binding
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:16 PM Peng QL Li < lplpli@...> wrote:
+ 1 binding
Regards
Peng Li
From: <cdf-toc@...> on behalf of Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@...>
Date: Friday, November 26, 2021 at 10:32 PM
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
Dear all, At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating
project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
This message came from outside your organization.
|
|
|
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
|
|
|
Alois Reitbauer <a.reitbauer@...>
+1 non-binding. Looking forward to merge with Keptn events in the months to come.
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information: During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked: - What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
- Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
- How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev CDF TOC Chair Jenkins/Dynatrace/Keptn
|
|
|
Jason Hall <jasonhall@...>
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 7:16 PM Peng QL Li < lplpli@...> wrote:
+ 1 binding
Regards
Peng Li
From: <cdf-toc@...> on behalf of Oleg Nenashev <o.v.nenashev@...>
Date: Friday, November 26, 2021 at 10:32 PM
To: cdf-toc <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [cdf-toc] VOTE: Membership request from the CD Events project
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
|
This Message Is From an External Sender
|
|
This message came from outside your organization.
|
|
|
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear all,
At yesterday's CDF Technical Oversight Committee meeting we decided to initiate voting for official status of the
CD Events specification as an incubating project within the CDF. Andrea Frittoli and Steven Taylor presented CD Events to the TOC, and they also act as TOC sponsors. I am also happy to support this project. Here are the links to the key information:
During the conversation at the CDF TOC meeting, there were several key questions asked:
-
What is the roadmap for CD Events? The Project Lifecycle requirements don't require an incubating project to have an explicit roadmap. It is required only for the graduated project. At the meeting we agreed that it's important for candidate number projects
or to have a clear roadmap, and it will be added to the requirement checklist for future projects
-
Will acceptance to the CDF mean the CDEvents specification is finalized (a.k.a 1.0 not)? No, it is quite the opposite. Joining the CDF allows to get more feedback and participation from users and potential adopters. There will be no immediate release
of 1.0 specification, and it will be explicitly clarified on the roadmap
-
How the relations between SIG Events and CD Events will evolve further? The project will start from the governing body being represented by the CDF Events SIG. Then a new governance model will be introduced based on the CDF recommendations and the community
around the new project
On behalf of the technical oversight committee, I would like to thank all participants of the Events SIG that worked on this specification and the reference implementations. I would also like to thank all projects, contributors and companies
who declared their intent to adopt the specification before 1.0. I am happy to cast my binding +1 vote for this proposal.
Best regards, Oleg Nenashev
|
|
|
