I took the action item in the last meeting to turn the collaboratively edited version of the CDF TOC Principles into a GitHub PR in preparation toward the approval.

This PR is here. If you have thoughts, feedbacks, etc., please let them come!

After the initial round of conversations, I haven't seen much activities on this, which I'm taking as a sign of consensus. If that continues, I think we can vote and approve this the next time we meet.

(That isn't to rush it, so if this email sparks a lively conversation, we should obviously let that run its course first)

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

Thanks Kohsuke! Looks great to me so far. Thanks to Tyler and Zhao for the feedback as well.

Dan Lorenc

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:57 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:

I took the action item in the last meeting to turn the collaboratively edited version of the CDF TOC Principles into a GitHub PR in preparation toward the approval.

This PR is here. If you have thoughts, feedbacks, etc., please let them come!

After the initial round of conversations, I haven't seen much activities on this, which I'm taking as a sign of consensus. If that continues, I think we can vote and approve this the next time we meet.

(That isn't to rush it, so if this email sparks a lively conversation, we should obviously let that run its course first)

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

I just incorporated one more round of feedbacks based on the new set of PR comments. Thanks Ray and Fatih!

Talk to you soon.

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:42 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:

Thanks Kohsuke! Looks great to me so far. Thanks to Tyler and Zhao for the feedback as well.

Dan Lorenc

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:57 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:

I took the action item in the last meeting to turn the collaboratively edited version of the CDF TOC Principles into a GitHub PR in preparation toward the approval.

This PR is here. If you have thoughts, feedbacks, etc., please let them come!

After the initial round of conversations, I haven't seen much activities on this, which I'm taking as a sign of consensus. If that continues, I think we can vote and approve this the next time we meet.

(That isn't to rush it, so if this email sparks a lively conversation, we should obviously let that run its course first)

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi