cdf-toc@lists.cd.foundation | [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Date Date 1 - 6 of 6

[CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs

Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...> #178 And I'm obviously also a +1 binding on this, given that I wrote it :) That leaves us with 6 votes in favor, so this should be good to go! Thanks everyone. Dan Lorenc toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 11:32 PM Yoav Landman via Lists.Cd.Foundation <yoavl=jfrog.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 3:53 Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote: This proposed edit makes sense to me. From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:49 PM To: cdf-toc@... Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs +1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has established itself and is showing ongoing traction then more timeline flexibility is reasonable but during the early days of both the foundation and the inevitable flurry of working group proposals I think that shorter initial timelines will be best. On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:49 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote: +1 binding On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:07 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi --
More All Messages By This Member
Yoav Landman #174 +1 binding toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 3:53 Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote: This proposed edit makes sense to me. From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:49 PM To: cdf-toc@... Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs +1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has established itself and is showing ongoing traction then more timeline flexibility is reasonable but during the early days of both the foundation and the inevitable flurry of working group proposals I think that shorter initial timelines will be best. On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:49 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote: +1 binding On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:07 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi --
More All Messages By This Member
Kay Williams <kayw@...> #172 This proposed edit makes sense to me. toggle quoted message Show quoted text From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:49 PM To: cdf-toc@... Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs +1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has established itself and is showing ongoing traction then more timeline flexibility is reasonable but during the early days of both the foundation and the inevitable flurry of working group proposals I think that shorter initial timelines will be best. On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:49 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote: +1 binding On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:07 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
More All Messages By This Member
Michael Winser #171 +1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has established itself and is showing ongoing traction then more timeline flexibility is reasonable but during the early days of both the foundation and the inevitable flurry of working group proposals I think that shorter initial timelines will be best. toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:49 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote: +1 binding On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:07 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi smime.p7s
More All Messages By This Member
Kohsuke Kawaguchi #170 +1 binding toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:07 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
More All Messages By This Member
Tara Hernandez #169 +1 binding toggle quoted message Show quoted text On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:09 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote: The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Dan Lorenc -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
More All Messages By This Member

1 - 6 of 6

1

Previous Topic Next Topic

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms