Thanks! I've added my availability.

I'm back to work from the hectic week that is OSLS. As everyone said it before, the launch went really well. Here are some thoughts that I'm starting to form that's relevant to what TOC might want to

Yes, this is great! I've made one pass. I gotta leave the keyboard now, but I'll come back to this later for more.

I wasn't sure how to fit this into a comment of the Google Doc, so instead I'm going to write it here. I was reading what Dan wrote more carefully, and I thought it'd help to dissect multiple layers i

It was nice to see you all. The agenda, notes, and action items for the meeting are here. Dan, I assume you'll have the link to the recording. When you get around to it, please add it to the doc!

I took the action item in the last meeting to turn the collaboratively edited version of the CDF TOC Principles into a GitHub PR in preparation toward the approval. This PR is here. If you have though

I just incorporated one more round of feedbacks based on the new set of PR comments. Thanks Ray and Fatih! Talk to you soon.

We will be meeting in an about an hour: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit

+1 binding. The PR has been open for 3 months and I believe all the outstanding comments are resolved and it's in a good enough shape to call it 1.0. As with everything else in the CDF, this is a livi

I fixed the permissions so that everyone in the TOC has the write access to the TOC repository. An invitation to James is outstanding -- when you get a chance, please accept it!

As the chair of the TOC, I get to cast one vote in the ongoing election of 2 additional TOC seats by the GB members. Since this vote represents the TOC, I wanted to make sure I have the full perspecti

Welcome aboard, Dan!!

We will be meeting in an about 30mins: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit

+1 binding

As discussed in the other thread, due to the logistical challenges, we are cancelling the TOC meeting tomorrow. The next one is on June 4th. The agenda is here.

Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 6 hours from now to be exact: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit

Cool! Here's some discussion that I'd like to have. Maybe more on the email list than in a meeting today, but here it goes. With the new project acceptance criteria in place, I feel like our shop is "

I thought they are recorded. I'll check this time. I think the question is worth digging deeper. If we are asking the projects for a status update, that'd be seen as a pointless work. I'm sure we all

Thanks. My interpretation of this in plain English is that "bottom line, don't worry, we are not impacted."

OK, So it sounds like the homework is to find a prior art inside the LF. I'll write a few emails to people I know. I suspect the answer is that this hasn't been done before, and then we'd have to prod