Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
FYI. Someone forwarded this article to me recently.
I don't have a direct first hand account from PRC on any issues with Zoom there. However, most developers find ways around restrictions and I've seen this with other conferencing tools like WebEx, Go-To-Meeting, etc.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:35 PM Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:
Hey folks, me again - unfortunately I will have to miss tomorrow's meeting due to a work conflict but please let me know if there's thoughts on whether or not people think the docs -> GitHub mechanism is fine or if anyone wants to propose another option.
-Tara
So glad to know that web client for zoom is not blocked. I thought the zoom already be blocked totally. Anyway, using zoom sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:25 AM Ramin Akhbari via Lists.Cd.Foundation <rakhbari=ebay.com@...> wrote:
My 2-cents… Switching to Skype would most definitely be equivalent to “Jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire” type situation. My personal experience with Skype has been far sub-par over the last 3-4 years and there’s no indication
it’s improving in any way. I highly recommend either Zoom or paid Slack (if CDF can afford it).
Cheers,
Ramin
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:23 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
Ah good to know on Zoom -- from comments in the last meeting it sounded like it might not work.
We can also certainly discuss if we want to switch editors, but thanks for indicating the github solution is known to be a legit one.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting
itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine
so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for
Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
Zhao Xiaojie (Rick) 
|
|
Thanks Dan! Yes, please add the Security SIG calendar invite to the CDF public calendar.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Dan Lopez via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 4:15 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Cc: Brian Russell <brianru@...>; Fred Blaise <fblaise@...>
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] Security SIG Update
Hello All
The Security SIG is now supported with the following operational tech:
For those on the TOC list that would like to get the calendar invite, please let me know and I can add you. Also, please let me know if you would like this calendar invite more public and added to the CDF public calendar.
Hey everyone, I wanted to share a quick update on the Security SIG:
-
We are making plans to hold our first bi-weekly meeting on Tuesday October 8 at 8:00 AM Pacific. These will be one hour ahead of the bi-weekly TOC meeting.
-
Dan Lopez is setting up a mailing list, calendar invite, zoom link, shared document space, etc.
-
I will send a welcome email and agenda to the TOC mailing list ahead of the meeting; everyone is welcome to attend.
Thoughts, questions? Please send to Brian, Fred (cc’d) and I.
Thanks!
Kay
|
|
Hello All
The Security SIG is now supported with the following operational tech: For those on the TOC list that would like to get the calendar invite, please let me know and I can add you. Also, please let me know if you would like this calendar invite more public and added to the CDF public calendar.
Best -- Dan Lopez The Linux Foundation +1 415.735.5881
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:53 AM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:26 AM Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote:
Hey everyone, I wanted to share a quick update on the Security SIG:
- We are making plans to hold our first bi-weekly meeting on Tuesday October 8 at 8:00 AM Pacific. These will be one hour ahead of the bi-weekly TOC meeting.
- Dan Lopez is setting up a mailing list, calendar invite, zoom link, shared document space, etc.
- I will send a welcome email and agenda to the TOC mailing list ahead of the meeting; everyone is welcome to attend.
Thoughts, questions? Please send to Brian, Fred (cc’d) and I.
Thanks!
Kay
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 8:26 AM Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote:
Hey everyone, I wanted to share a quick update on the Security SIG:
- We are making plans to hold our first bi-weekly meeting on Tuesday October 8 at 8:00 AM Pacific. These will be one hour ahead of the bi-weekly TOC meeting.
- Dan Lopez is setting up a mailing list, calendar invite, zoom link, shared document space, etc.
- I will send a welcome email and agenda to the TOC mailing list ahead of the meeting; everyone is welcome to attend.
Thoughts, questions? Please send to Brian, Fred (cc’d) and I.
Thanks!
Kay
|
|
Hey everyone, I wanted to share a quick update on the Security SIG:
- We are making plans to hold our first bi-weekly meeting on Tuesday October 8 at 8:00 AM Pacific. These will be one hour ahead of the bi-weekly TOC meeting.
- Dan Lopez is setting up a mailing list, calendar invite, zoom link, shared document space, etc.
- I will send a welcome email and agenda to the TOC mailing list ahead of the meeting; everyone is welcome to attend.
Thoughts, questions? Please send to Brian, Fred (cc’d) and I.
Thanks!
Kay
|
|
Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings

Tara Hernandez
Hey folks, me again - unfortunately I will have to miss tomorrow's meeting due to a work conflict but please let me know if there's thoughts on whether or not people think the docs -> GitHub mechanism is fine or if anyone wants to propose another option.
-Tara
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
So glad to know that web client for zoom is not blocked. I thought the zoom already be blocked totally. Anyway, using zoom sounds like a good idea.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:25 AM Ramin Akhbari via Lists.Cd.Foundation <rakhbari=ebay.com@...> wrote:
My 2-cents… Switching to Skype would most definitely be equivalent to “Jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire” type situation. My personal experience with Skype has been far sub-par over the last 3-4 years and there’s no indication
it’s improving in any way. I highly recommend either Zoom or paid Slack (if CDF can afford it).
Cheers,
Ramin
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:23 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
Ah good to know on Zoom -- from comments in the last meeting it sounded like it might not work.
We can also certainly discuss if we want to switch editors, but thanks for indicating the github solution is known to be a legit one.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting
itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine
so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for
Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
Zhao Xiaojie (Rick) 
|
|
Tracy Miranda <tmiranda@...>
Hi Animesh,
Great - thanks for kicking this off. I know a number of interested parties in this and will direct them to look at the PR and give feedback/help build it out. Maybe also we can add to agenda for an upcoming TOC meeting.
Tracy
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi All,
Would like to see the appetite in the community for an MLOps Sig. I am part of IBM, and participating heavily in Kubeflow community. I have created a straw-man proposal here, and based on the initial interest of the group, will do a formal PR and bring it back for vote!
https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/issues/34
Thanks, Animesh Singh
|
|
Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
So glad to know that web client for zoom is not blocked. I thought the zoom already be blocked totally. Anyway, using zoom sounds like a good idea.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 4:25 AM Ramin Akhbari via Lists.Cd.Foundation <rakhbari=ebay.com@...> wrote:
My 2-cents… Switching to Skype would most definitely be equivalent to “Jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire” type situation. My personal experience with Skype has been far sub-par over the last 3-4 years and there’s no indication
it’s improving in any way. I highly recommend either Zoom or paid Slack (if CDF can afford it).
Cheers,
Ramin
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:23 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
Ah good to know on Zoom -- from comments in the last meeting it sounded like it might not work.
We can also certainly discuss if we want to switch editors, but thanks for indicating the github solution is known to be a legit one.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting
itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine
so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for
Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
-- Zhao Xiaojie (Rick) 
|
|
Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
My 2-cents… Switching to Skype would most definitely be equivalent to “Jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire” type situation. My personal experience with Skype has been far sub-par over the last 3-4 years and there’s no indication
it’s improving in any way. I highly recommend either Zoom or paid Slack (if CDF can afford it).
Cheers,
Ramin
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 1:23 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings
Ah good to know on Zoom -- from comments in the last meeting it sounded like it might not work.
We can also certainly discuss if we want to switch editors, but thanks for indicating the github solution is known to be a legit one.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting
itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine
so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for
Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
|
Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings

Tara Hernandez
Ah good to know on Zoom -- from comments in the last meeting it sounded like it might not work. We can also certainly discuss if we want to switch editors, but thanks for indicating the github solution is known to be a legit one.
Cheers! -Tara
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:56 AM Chris Aniszczyk < caniszczyk@...> wrote: Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
-Tara
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
|
Re: Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings

Chris Aniszczyk
Zoom isn't blocked in China yet, there's special instructions:
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
-Tara
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Supporting China based contributors for TOC meetings

Tara Hernandez
Hey folks, attempting to close out my action items from the last meeting.
It continues to look like github is our best bet for the meetings notes. I'm not finding anything else that's reliably available everywhere that really inspires, and this way it can be centralized to our TOC repo.
The downside to this of course is that we lose the shared editing during the meeting, so another possibility is that we publish the meetings notes to github once the meeting is complete but that we continue to use Docs during the meeting itself so most folks have the ability to amend, comment, etc. I've tested a pretty straightforward way to do a publish that would support this model and you can see the results here:
I was also looking around at possible non-zoom chat options, and Skype and WeChat seem to be the most legit options (there's another one called Pinngle but all the reviews ultimately seem to be self-sourced by one guy out of the Ukraine so I'm not feeling awesome about it). Comments on Skype seem to indicate that from China you're redirected to download the Chinese version so it's recommended to VPN your way to a better source, but regardless there can be quality issues. The consensus for Wechat is that it's not ready for primetime outside of China yet (though inside of course it is King).
I suspect most people already knew all of this, but I guess I'm wondering out loud if we ultimately feel we can realistically support real time voice chat participation in China or similarly censored countries at this time?
Anyway, talk to you Tuesday!
-Tara
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
|
Hi All, Would like to see the appetite in the community for an MLOps Sig. I am part of IBM, and participating heavily in Kubeflow community. I have created a straw-man proposal here, and based on the initial interest of the group, will do a formal PR and bring it back for vote! https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/issues/34Thanks, Animesh Singh
|
|
Presentations from CDF Contributor Summit in Aug
Tracy Miranda <tmiranda@...>
Hi all,
As mentioned on the TOC call today, I've set up a folder to collate presentations from the CDF Contributor summit last month in San Francisco.
If you gave a presentation at the summit, please submit a PR linking in you talks, thanks! (I have lots of folks asking for the content for those talks)
Tracy
|
|
I also cannot make today’s call. Technical difficulties. :( Fred, Brian and I are working on Security SIG formation and we will have an update at the next TOC meeting, if not over email before.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> on behalf of Kohsuke Kawaguchi via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kk=kohsuke.org@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 8:38:55 AM
To: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
Subject: [cdf-toc] Regrets today
My apologies for the last minute notice but I have a schedule conflict today for the TOC meeting. I hope Dan Lorenc would be able to run it for us.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
|

Tara Hernandez
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Unfortunately Dan is on paternity leave. He asked me to run it (which I'm happy to do) but apparently only one of you two can actually start the zoom session?
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:39 AM Kohsuke Kawaguchi < kk@...> wrote: My apologies for the last minute notice but I have a schedule conflict today for the TOC meeting. I hope Dan Lorenc would be able to run it for us.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
--
Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
|

Tara Hernandez
Unfortunately Dan is on paternity leave. He asked me to run it (which I'm happy to do) but apparently only one of you two can actually start the zoom session?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:39 AM Kohsuke Kawaguchi < kk@...> wrote: My apologies for the last minute notice but I have a schedule conflict today for the TOC meeting. I hope Dan Lorenc would be able to run it for us.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
-- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
|
My apologies for the last minute notice but I have a schedule conflict today for the TOC meeting. I hope Dan Lorenc would be able to run it for us.
-- Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
|
Hi TOC
I have gone ahead and created the sig-security repo:
We can update the settings and permissions as needed. Please also let me know who should be on the the sig-security github team.
Best, -- Dan Lopez The Linux Foundation +1 415.735.5881
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 3:44 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi < kk@...> wrote: Woohoo!
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:35 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding. This is now accepted!
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yoav Landman via Lists.Cd.Foundation <yoavl=jfrog.com@...> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 9:26 PM Andy Glover via Lists.Cd.Foundation <aglover=netflix.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:07 PM Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation <michaelwinser=google.com@...> wrote:
+1 non binding. Very happy to see this going and looking forward to the next steps.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:02 PM Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:53 PM Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote:
+ 1 non-binding. :-) Thanks everyone!
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Kohsuke Kawaguchi via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 4:51 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] [VOTE] Security SIG
And here's my binding +1.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:50 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:
My sense is that everyone seems very happy with the Security SIG proposal as I havent' seen any further comments for a while.
The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/26
Only the TOC members have the binding votes, but I'd love to also see non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support. As per our process definition, this vote requires the majority of the binding votes to pass.
Thanks to Kay Williams for patiently driving this process and paving the way for more SIGs that will follow!
--
--
--
Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
Andrew Glover Director of Delivery Engineering Netflix, Inc.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
|
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:35 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding. This is now accepted!
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 3:41 PM Yoav Landman via Lists.Cd.Foundation <yoavl=jfrog.com@...> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 9:26 PM Andy Glover via Lists.Cd.Foundation <aglover=netflix.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 5:07 PM Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation <michaelwinser=google.com@...> wrote:
+1 non binding. Very happy to see this going and looking forward to the next steps.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:02 PM Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:53 PM Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote:
+ 1 non-binding. :-) Thanks everyone!
From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Kohsuke Kawaguchi via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2019 4:51 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [cdf-toc] [VOTE] Security SIG
And here's my binding +1.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:50 PM Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:
My sense is that everyone seems very happy with the Security SIG proposal as I havent' seen any further comments for a while.
The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/26
Only the TOC members have the binding votes, but I'd love to also see non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support. As per our process definition, this vote requires the majority of the binding votes to pass.
Thanks to Kay Williams for patiently driving this process and paving the way for more SIGs that will follow!
--
--
--
Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud
--
Andrew Glover Director of Delivery Engineering Netflix, Inc.
|
|