Is 8am PST too early?

This looks like it would be better for every other location.

8am PST == 6pm Tel Aviv == 8:30pm India == 12am Tokyo

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019, 19:31 Tara Hernandez via Lists.Cd.Foundation <tarahernandez=google.com@...> wrote:

So, I was staring at time zones, and came up with this possibility, assuming we alternate every meeting, so most folks get  _something_ plausible at least once a month:

9am PST == 7pm Tel Aviv == 9:30pm India == 1am Tokyo

and:

6pm PST == 4am Tel Aviv == 6:30am India == 10am Tokyo

India is admittedly getting somewhat sacrificed at the expense of keeping things more or less reasonable for the Left Coasters, but not sure how evil that is (any later is going to be very hard for most of our primary members, methinks)

What do y'all think?

--

Tara Hernandez

Engineering Manager Google Cloud

I've finally updated the Roadmap WG proposal based on the feedback.

So I'm also calling a vote on this to get this blessed.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

I'll start with my own +1.

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

Non-binding +1 the project excites me.

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019, 19:46 Marky Jackson <marky.r.jackson@...> wrote:

Having worked at Yahoo! during the building of this tool I am a huge +1

On Nov 5, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:

I'm calling the new round of voting for the incubation of Screwdriver.

The original presentation from the project is here. The proposal has been updated based on the feedback from the previous round of votes. In particular, the growth plan.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

So, I was staring at time zones, and came up with this possibility, assuming we alternate every meeting, so most folks get  _something_ plausible at least once a month:

9am PST == 7pm Tel Aviv == 9:30pm India == 1am Tokyo

and:

6pm PST == 4am Tel Aviv == 6:30am India == 10am Tokyo

India is admittedly getting somewhat sacrificed at the expense of keeping things more or less reasonable for the Left Coasters, but not sure how evil that is (any later is going to be very hard for most of our primary members, methinks)

What do y'all think?

--

Tara Hernandez

Engineering Manager Google Cloud

Having worked at Yahoo! during the building of this tool I am a huge +1

On Nov 5, 2019, at 9:44 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kk@...> wrote:

I'm calling the new round of voting for the incubation of Screwdriver.

The original presentation from the project is here. The proposal has been updated based on the feedback from the previous round of votes. In particular, the growth plan.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi

Hi all,

Does this policy apply to telemetry engines which were introduced *before* the new policy was announced? It is not clear from the text, but it is important if it becomes a policy for CDF projects.

Thanks in advance,

Oleg Nenashev

Jenkins project

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, 01:57 Dan Lopez <dlopez@...> wrote:

Thanks, Dan!

It is also on the agenda for tomorrow TOC call.

Best,

--

Dan Lopez

The Linux Foundation

+1 415.735.5881

dlopez@...

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:

This was recently published: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/telemetry-data-policy/

It covers the policies and review process for the collection of data. We might want to consider adding this to our project guidelines.

Dan Lorenc

Thanks, Dan!

It is also on the agenda for tomorrow TOC call.

Best,

--

Dan Lopez

The Linux Foundation

+1 415.735.5881

dlopez@...

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation <dlorenc=google.com@...> wrote:

This was recently published: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/telemetry-data-policy/

It covers the policies and review process for the collection of data. We might want to consider adding this to our project guidelines.

Dan Lorenc

This was recently published: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/telemetry-data-policy/

It covers the policies and review process for the collection of data. We might want to consider adding this to our project guidelines.

Dan Lorenc

One more niggly PR filed to fix some language in the README for that repo: https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape/pull/37

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 12:15 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Issue Tracking SGTM

Also here is the link for folks who don't have it readily available:

https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape#current-version

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 1:42 PM TracyRagan <tracy@...> wrote:

Hello distinguished TOC members.

Please let me know if you have any issues with the landscape.  We would love to get it out, start blogging about it, tweeting etc.   If the categories work we will publish it so organizations can start adding their logos. 

One last thought - Do you think we should add an Issue Tracking category? 

--

Kind Regards,

Tracy Ragan

CEO and Co-Founder / DeployHub / tel: + 1.505.424.6440/ mob: +1.505.780.0558

Continuous Delivery Foundation Board Member

Follow us on: Blog / Twitter / Facebook / LinkedIn / YouTube / GitHub

Where developers share and find microservices

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

--

Tara Hernandez

Engineering Manager Google Cloud

Issue Tracking SGTM

Also here is the link for folks who don't have it readily available:

https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape#current-version

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 1:42 PM TracyRagan <tracy@...> wrote:

Hello distinguished TOC members.

Please let me know if you have any issues with the landscape.  We would love to get it out, start blogging about it, tweeting etc.   If the categories work we will publish it so organizations can start adding their logos. 

One last thought - Do you think we should add an Issue Tracking category? 

--

Kind Regards,

Tracy Ragan

CEO and Co-Founder / DeployHub / tel: + 1.505.424.6440/ mob: +1.505.780.0558

Continuous Delivery Foundation Board Member

Follow us on: Blog / Twitter / Facebook / LinkedIn / YouTube / GitHub

Where developers share and find microservices

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Thank you Emma for taking the time to review the landscape. In terms of multiple logos, it should represent complete separate products.  Like IBM has a solution in ARA and a complete different product in testing. I'm not sure at this point if companies are going to be allowed to list in multiple places when they have multiple tools. I understand what you are saying, for example DeployHub could be listed in ARA and config. management, but we just have deployhub listed in our core focus area. I believe this is the intent of the landscape.  

More to come...

Tracy

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 5:28 PM Emma Webb <emma@...> wrote:

Thanks for all your hard work here, Tracy and team. 

I noticed that we have a few vendors in multiple categories, which makes sense as different groups cover additional functionality. If we're allowing for single logos listed in multiple places, I would be interested to see the criteria - we could certainly put CircleCI in test automation, build automation, and image build, as well as both pipeline orchestration and CI. 

The logo stacking in pipeline orchestration also seems a bit inconsistent - is it possible to find a more neutral treatment for these? 

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:19 PM Michael Neale <mneale@...> wrote:

I had 2 PRs open which were moving some things around I thought were important. There is another PR open for a new project I saw - would be good to address those if possible. 

On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 4:42 am, Tracy Ragan <tracy@...> wrote:

Hello distinguished TOC members.

Please let me know if you have any issues with the landscape.  We would love to get it out, start blogging about it, tweeting etc.   If the categories work we will publish it so organizations can start adding their logos. 

One last thought - Do you think we should add an Issue Tracking category? 

--

Kind Regards,

Tracy Ragan

CEO and Co-Founder / DeployHub / tel: + 1.505.424.6440/ mob: +1.505.780.0558

Continuous Delivery Foundation Board Member

Follow us on: Blog / Twitter / Facebook / LinkedIn / YouTube / GitHub

Where developers share and find microservices

--

Regards, 

Michael Neale

twitter: @michaelneale, skype: michael_d_neale

Cell: +61 423175597 (Australia)

Cofounder @ CloudBees

--

Emma Webb

CircleCI Marketing

--

Kind Regards,

Tracy Ragan

CEO and Co-Founder / DeployHub / tel: + 1.505.424.6440/ mob: +1.505.780.0558

Continuous Delivery Foundation Board Member

Follow us on: Blog / Twitter / Facebook / LinkedIn / YouTube / GitHub

Where developers share and find microservices

I'm traveling in Tokyo and therefore I won't be able to make it to the TOC meeting tomorrow. I'm hoping Tara would be able to run the meeting for us.

--

Kohsuke Kawaguchi