|
Re: TOC meeting today
I sent the creds to you privately KK, I'm about to jump on a plane so I won't be there.--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
I sent the creds to you privately KK, I'm about to jump on a plane so I won't be there.--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#181
·
|
|
Re: TOC meeting today
Am I supposed to have the host code to start this zoom meeting? If so, I'm afraid I don't have the credentials setup --- I didn't even realize until now that that's needed, but I guess Dan Lopez must
Am I supposed to have the host code to start this zoom meeting? If so, I'm afraid I don't have the credentials setup --- I didn't even realize until now that that's needed, but I guess Dan Lopez must
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#180
·
|
|
TOC meeting today
Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 15 mins from now to be exact:
https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc
The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit
--
Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 15 mins from now to be exact:
https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc
The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit
--
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#179
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
And I'm obviously also a +1 binding on this, given that I wrote it :)
That leaves us with 6 votes in favor, so this should be good to go! Thanks everyone.
Dan Lorenc
And I'm obviously also a +1 binding on this, given that I wrote it :)
That leaves us with 6 votes in favor, so this should be good to go! Thanks everyone.
Dan Lorenc
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#178
·
|
|
CD Summit NA - Call for program committee members
Hi all,
We are ramping up to CD Summit North America which will be in San Diego on Monday November 18th.
Christie Wilson & I will be co-chairing the program committee and we would like some folks to
Hi all,
We are ramping up to CD Summit North America which will be in San Diego on Monday November 18th.
Christie Wilson & I will be co-chairing the program committee and we would like some folks to
|
By
Tracy Miranda <tmiranda@...>
·
#177
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Screwdriver.cd
So Tara's point, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that the project in the incubation phase is expected to have a growth plan. The idea here is that there should be a consensus and transparency
So Tara's point, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that the project in the incubation phase is expected to have a growth plan. The idea here is that there should be a consensus and transparency
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#176
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Screwdriver.cd
I'm a little late to the party as I was on vacation. Looks like this topic needs more discussion before we call a vote.
I hear the point from Andy & Tara that, in my understanding, basically boils
I'm a little late to the party as I was on vacation. Looks like this topic needs more discussion before we call a vote.
I hear the point from Andy & Tara that, in my understanding, basically boils
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#175
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 binding
--
By
Yoav Landman
·
#174
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Screwdriver.cd
-1 binding
(as a 'defer' not a 'deny')
To Andy's point, I also feel like we need better details and transparency around the goals of the existing projects so that we can quantify how any new projects
-1 binding
(as a 'defer' not a 'deny')
To Andy's point, I also feel like we need better details and transparency around the goals of the existing projects so that we can quantify how any new projects
|
By
Tara Hernandez
·
#173
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
This proposed edit makes sense to me.
This proposed edit makes sense to me.
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#172
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 non binding
I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months"
I think that once a working group has
+1 non binding
I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months"
I think that once a working group has
|
By
Michael Winser
·
#171
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 binding
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
+1 binding
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#170
·
|
|
Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 binding
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
+1 binding
--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
By
Tara Hernandez
·
#169
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Screwdriver.cd
+1 non binding.
I saw the screwdriver presentation and it looked really impressive. After the fundamentals are agreed upon I think it could be a great asset.
+1 non binding.
I saw the screwdriver presentation and it looked really impressive. After the fundamentals are agreed upon I think it could be a great asset.
|
By
Avi Kessner
·
#168
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 non-binding
--
Zhao Xiaojie (Rick)
Blog: https://github.com/LinuxSuRen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/suren69811254
+1 non-binding
--
Zhao Xiaojie (Rick)
Blog: https://github.com/LinuxSuRen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/suren69811254
|
By
Rick
·
#167
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
+1 binding.
--
Andrew Glover
Director of Delivery Engineering
Netflix, Inc.
+1 binding.
--
Andrew Glover
Director of Delivery Engineering
Netflix, Inc.
|
By
Andy Glover
·
#166
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Screwdriver.cd
I am a -1. We (the CDF TOC) haven't (yet) formalized an interoperability plan/strategy for the existing member projects. I think we should clarify how all these projects fit together for the benefit
I am a -1. We (the CDF TOC) haven't (yet) formalized an interoperability plan/strategy for the existing member projects. I think we should clarify how all these projects fit together for the benefit
|
By
Andy Glover
·
#165
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
Got it. Thanks. :-)
+1 non-binding
Got it. Thanks. :-)
+1 non-binding
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#164
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
As an example, you can reply "+1 non-binding" if you aren't on the TOC and "+1 binding" if you are on the TOC.
In your case, "+1 non-binding" or -1 "non-binding" would work :)
--
Chris Aniszczyk
As an example, you can reply "+1 non-binding" if you aren't on the TOC and "+1 binding" if you are on the TOC.
In your case, "+1 non-binding" or -1 "non-binding" would work :)
--
Chris Aniszczyk
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#163
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs
I think I may have missed something. What is the process for voting? (Sorry if this is a newbie question.)
I think I may have missed something. What is the process for voting? (Sorry if this is a newbie question.)
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#162
·
|