|
Security SIG Update
Hi All,
I won’t be able to make the TOC meeting today, but I wanted to provide an update from the Security SIG.
The main focus right now is an effort to create an industry standard for a
Hi All,
I won’t be able to make the TOC meeting today, but I wanted to provide an update from the Security SIG.
The main focus right now is an effort to create an industry standard for a
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#269
·
|
|
Re: FYI: New LF Telemetry Policy
I think it's reasonable to assume that what we already do is grandfathered in, but it'd be good to have Jenkins go through this review process to meet the new bar.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
I think it's reasonable to assume that what we already do is grandfathered in, but it'd be good to have Jenkins go through this review process to meet the new bar.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#268
·
|
|
Re: FYI: New LF Telemetry Policy
Hi all,
Does this policy apply to telemetry engines which were introduced *before* the new policy was announced? It is not clear from the text, but it is important if it becomes a policy for CDF
Hi all,
Does this policy apply to telemetry engines which were introduced *before* the new policy was announced? It is not clear from the text, but it is important if it becomes a policy for CDF
|
By
Oleg Nenashev
·
#267
·
|
|
Re: FYI: New LF Telemetry Policy
Thanks, Dan!
It is also on the agenda for tomorrow TOC call.
Best,
--
Dan Lopez
The Linux Foundation
+1 415.735.5881
dlopez@...
Thanks, Dan!
It is also on the agenda for tomorrow TOC call.
Best,
--
Dan Lopez
The Linux Foundation
+1 415.735.5881
dlopez@...
|
By
Dan Lopez <dlopez@...>
·
#266
·
|
|
FYI: New LF Telemetry Policy
This was recently published: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/telemetry-data-policy/
It covers the policies and review process for the collection of data. We might want to consider adding this to our
This was recently published: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/telemetry-data-policy/
It covers the policies and review process for the collection of data. We might want to consider adding this to our
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#265
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
This has been fixed.
--
Dan Lopez
The Linux Foundation
+1 415.735.5881
dlopez@...
This has been fixed.
--
Dan Lopez
The Linux Foundation
+1 415.735.5881
dlopez@...
|
By
Dan Lopez <dlopez@...>
·
#264
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
One more niggly PR filed to fix some language in the README for that repo: https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape/pull/37--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
One more niggly PR filed to fix some language in the README for that repo: https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape/pull/37--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
By
Tara Hernandez
·
#263
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
I like the approach of using the "core focus area". How would you objectively define that (to avoid vendors arguing forever about it)?--
Moritz Plassnig
VP, Cloud
CloudBees, Inc.
P:
I like the approach of using the "core focus area". How would you objectively define that (to avoid vendors arguing forever about it)?--
Moritz Plassnig
VP, Cloud
CloudBees, Inc.
P:
|
By
Moritz Plassnig
·
#262
·
|
|
Re: Regrets tomorrow
Sure thing, enjoy Tokyo!--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
Sure thing, enjoy Tokyo!--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
By
Tara Hernandez
·
#261
·
|
|
Regrets tomorrow
I'm traveling in Tokyo and therefore I won't be able to make it to the TOC meeting tomorrow. I'm hoping Tara would be able to run the meeting for us.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
I'm traveling in Tokyo and therefore I won't be able to make it to the TOC meeting tomorrow. I'm hoping Tara would be able to run the meeting for us.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#260
·
|
|
Re: How are other projects signing releases?
I've added my thought as a comment to the PR.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
I've added my thought as a comment to the PR.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#259
·
|
|
Re: Proposal: MLOps Sig
Thanks all. There is great interest in this working group, and so far we have seen Github, Cloud Bees, Google onboard apart from IBM. I will now formally put in the right repo - and figure out a
Thanks all. There is great interest in this working group, and so far we have seen Github, Cloud Bees, Google onboard apart from IBM. I will now formally put in the right repo - and figure out a
|
By
Animesh Singh
·
#258
·
|
|
Re: Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
I had 2 PRs open which were moving some things around I thought were important. There is another PR open for a new project I saw - would be good to address those if possible.
--
Regards,
Michael
I had 2 PRs open which were moving some things around I thought were important. There is another PR open for a new project I saw - would be good to address those if possible.
--
Regards,
Michael
|
By
Michael Neale
·
#257
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
Thanks Tara!
-Ravi
---
Ravi Lachhman | Evangelist
ravi.lachhman@... | @ravilach
+1-678-458-3898
Thanks Tara!
-Ravi
---
Ravi Lachhman | Evangelist
ravi.lachhman@... | @ravilach
+1-678-458-3898
|
By
Ravi Lachhman
·
#256
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
Hi Ravi, the CDF has its own version of that posted here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/blob/master/PROJECT_LIFECYCLE.md--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
Hi Ravi, the CDF has its own version of that posted here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/blob/master/PROJECT_LIFECYCLE.md--
Tara Hernandez
Engineering Manager Google Cloud
|
By
Tara Hernandez
·
#255
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
Hi Tracy,
logo placements seems little off. Can I call you for a quick discussion? I would think it would make sense to have the primary project on the top and vendors on the bottom row for the CI
Hi Tracy,
logo placements seems little off. Can I call you for a quick discussion? I would think it would make sense to have the primary project on the top and vendors on the bottom row for the CI
|
By
Balaji Siva
·
#254
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
Just out of curiosity, what is the criteria for "graduation"?
Following the CNCF criteria?
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc
Cheers,
-Ravi
---
Ravi Lachhman |
Just out of curiosity, what is the criteria for "graduation"?
Following the CNCF criteria?
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc
Cheers,
-Ravi
---
Ravi Lachhman |
|
By
Ravi Lachhman
·
#253
·
|
|
Re: [cdf-outreach] Is the Landscape ready for prime time?
Issue Tracking SGTM
Also here is the link for folks who don't have it readily available:
https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape#current-version
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Issue Tracking SGTM
Also here is the link for folks who don't have it readily available:
https://github.com/cdfoundation/cdf-landscape#current-version
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#252
·
|
|
Re: Announcing the CDF Security SIG
Correction. SIG-Security meetings will be held at 8 AM Pacific. Our first meeting will be next Tuesday 10/8. Join us!
From: Kay Williams
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 10:26 AM
To: cdf-toc@...
Correction. SIG-Security meetings will be held at 8 AM Pacific. Our first meeting will be next Tuesday 10/8. Join us!
From: Kay Williams
Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 10:26 AM
To: cdf-toc@...
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#251
·
|
|
Announcing the CDF Security SIG
Hey everyone, I am excited to announce the formation of the Security SIG - the CD Foundation’s first Special Interest Group (SIG)! The Security SIG began as alightning talk at the first CD Summit
Hey everyone, I am excited to announce the formation of the Security SIG - the CD Foundation’s first Special Interest Group (SIG)! The Security SIG began as alightning talk at the first CD Summit
|
By
Kay Williams <kayw@...>
·
#250
·
|