|
Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Hey all!
The role of the CDF Technical Oversight Committee (TOC) is to facilitate communication and collaboration among the Technical Projects. The TOC will be responsible for:
- coordinating
Hey all!
The role of the CDF Technical Oversight Committee (TOC) is to facilitate communication and collaboration among the Technical Projects. The TOC will be responsible for:
- coordinating
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Considering the initial members are between PDT and GMT, I'm sure scheduling
this will be fun :)
--
GitHub: https://github.com/rtyler
GPG Key ID: 0F2298A980EE31ACCA0A7825E5C92681BEF6CEA2
Considering the initial members are between PDT and GMT, I'm sure scheduling
this will be fun :)
--
GitHub: https://github.com/rtyler
GPG Key ID: 0F2298A980EE31ACCA0A7825E5C92681BEF6CEA2
|
By
R. Tyler Croy
·
#2
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
I sent a doodle here: https://doodle.com/poll/7kfkgsheg39rtmzn
These are open meetings so everyone is free/encouraged to vote but we'll prioritize availability of the TOC members.
Dan Lorenc
On Thu,
I sent a doodle here: https://doodle.com/poll/7kfkgsheg39rtmzn
These are open meetings so everyone is free/encouraged to vote but we'll prioritize availability of the TOC members.
Dan Lorenc
On Thu,
|
By
dlorenc@...
·
#3
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Thanks! I've added my availability.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Thanks! I've added my availability.--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#4
·
|
|
Thoughts from OSLS
I'm back to work from the hectic week that is OSLS. As everyone said it before, the launch went really well. Here are some thoughts that I'm starting to form that's relevant to what TOC might want to
I'm back to work from the hectic week that is OSLS. As everyone said it before, the launch went really well. Here are some thoughts that I'm starting to form that's relevant to what TOC might want to
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Thanks for sending this! Some thoughts inline, and I look forward to discussing more in person.
This came up with me as well. I think we should try to understand the motivations these companies have
Thanks for sending this! Some thoughts inline, and I look forward to discussing more in person.
This came up with me as well. I think we should try to understand the motivations these companies have
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
I'm happy to see this discussion going on and my advice would be to focus on two things:
1) establish a set of principles/values that the CDF TOC can agree on as clarity helps with consensus building,
I'm happy to see this discussion going on and my advice would be to focus on two things:
1) establish a set of principles/values that the CDF TOC can agree on as clarity helps with consensus building,
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#7
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Thanks Chris! I threw some initial ideas on principles/values, etc. down here. I started with some of the format from the CNCF documents.
Thanks Chris! I threw some initial ideas on principles/values, etc. down here. I started with some of the format from the CNCF documents.
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
This is great, thanks for putting this together, Dan!
-Andy
--
Andrew Glover
Director of Delivery Engineering
Netflix, Inc.
This is great, thanks for putting this together, Dan!
-Andy
--
Andrew Glover
Director of Delivery Engineering
Netflix, Inc.
|
By
Andy Glover
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Yes, this is great! I've made one pass. I gotta leave the keyboard now, but I'll come back to this later for more.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Yes, this is great! I've made one pass. I gotta leave the keyboard now, but I'll come back to this later for more.
--
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Good start, reminder to also fill out the doodle poll for the first meeting:
https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/issues/1
https://doodle.com/poll/7kfkgsheg39rtmzn
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |
Good start, reminder to also fill out the doodle poll for the first meeting:
https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/issues/1
https://doodle.com/poll/7kfkgsheg39rtmzn
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#11
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Hi all, I have added my availability as well. I introduced myself at the kickoff meeting - I work in the Azure Office of the CTO. Microsoft is not a member of the CD Foundation at this time, but I am
Hi all, I have added my availability as well. I introduced myself at the kickoff meeting - I work in the Azure Office of the CTO. Microsoft is not a member of the CD Foundation at this time, but I am
|
By
kayw@...
·
#12
·
|
|
CDF Project Acceptance Criteria/Process
At our upcoming meeting, we should come up with a project proposal process, I highly recommend looking NodeJS/OpenJS as a
At our upcoming meeting, we should come up with a project proposal process, I highly recommend looking NodeJS/OpenJS as a
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Hi all,
I just added my availability as well. To introduce myself, I work with ThoughtWorks Products where we build GoCD. At ThoughtWorks we have experience and a rich legacy with CD. Our products
Hi all,
I just added my availability as well. To introduce myself, I work with ThoughtWorks Products where we build GoCD. At ThoughtWorks we have experience and a rich legacy with CD. Our products
|
By
Sheroy Marker
·
#14
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Hey All,
I just closed the poll, apologies for not doing that earlier. The chosen time is tomorrow at 9 PST. The calendar invite is here in this
Hey All,
I just closed the poll, apologies for not doing that earlier. The chosen time is tomorrow at 9 PST. The calendar invite is here in this
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#15
·
|
|
Re: Bootstrapping the CDF TOC
Thanks Dan, here's the agenda doc for tomorrow:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit#
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Thanks Dan, here's the agenda doc for tomorrow:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit#
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#16
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
I wasn't sure how to fit this into a comment of the Google Doc, so instead I'm going to write it here.
I was reading what Dan wrote more carefully, and I thought it'd help to dissect multiple layers
I wasn't sure how to fit this into a comment of the Google Doc, so instead I'm going to write it here.
I was reading what Dan wrote more carefully, and I thought it'd help to dissect multiple layers
|
By
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
·
#17
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Sounds great to me! I didn't put too much thought into the organization and your layout makes sense to me.
The sections I used for inspiration from the cncf and other documents came from all over.
Dan
Sounds great to me! I didn't put too much thought into the organization and your layout makes sense to me.
The sections I used for inspiration from the cncf and other documents came from all over.
Dan
|
By
Dan Lorenc <dlorenc@...>
·
#18
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
I am new to these discussions, so please forgive if I mention something that has been discussed or covered elsewhere.
Would folks consider modifying the charter slightly to focus on ‘standards
I am new to these discussions, so please forgive if I mention something that has been discussed or covered elsewhere.
Would folks consider modifying the charter slightly to focus on ‘standards
|
By
kayw@...
·
#19
·
|
|
Re: Thoughts from OSLS
Hey Kay, great to have you here!
I don't see how any of those reasons would preclude any organization from joining or participating in any technical discussions (we are not a traditional standards
Hey Kay, great to have you here!
I don't see how any of those reasons would preclude any organization from joining or participating in any technical discussions (we are not a traditional standards
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#20
·
|