Hello CD Foundation Collaborators, Please help me in sending a warm welcome to our newest members: eBay JPMChase Whitesource Software Cycloid DevOps Institute The Continuous Delivery Foundation is

Hey everyone, Fred’s suggestion makes sense to me. Fred (CloudBees ), Brian (Google) and I (Microsoft) are meeting for the first time this coming Friday (8/23). Our respective companies are

Hi Dan, We're meeting on Friday for some introduction and some quick brainstorm. I think we ould postpone the call for a vote to early next week? Admittedly, I didn't have much time to pour thoughts

There doesn't appear to be much activity on the PR - I'll give people a few more days then call a vote Wednesday.

Thanks all who got in touch for PC - will let you know next steps once I've synced with Christie. Meanwhile the CFP is now open, please share with your communities and submit talks here

Hi all, I have created a pull request for a Security Special Interest Group (SIG). See the link below. https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/26 Please take a look a share comments either on the

Thanks, Chris. See you soon in San Francisco.-- Kohsuke Kawaguchi

My apologies, folks. The bridge is up now-- Kohsuke Kawaguchi

I sent the creds to you privately KK, I'm about to jump on a plane so I won't be there.-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Am I supposed to have the host code to start this zoom meeting? If so, I'm afraid I don't have the credentials setup --- I didn't even realize until now that that's needed, but I guess Dan Lopez must

Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 15 mins from now to be exact: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit --

And I'm obviously also a +1 binding on this, given that I wrote it :) That leaves us with 6 votes in favor, so this should be good to go! Thanks everyone. Dan Lorenc

Hi all, We are ramping up to CD Summit North America which will be in San Diego on Monday November 18th. Christie Wilson & I will be co-chairing the program committee and we would like some folks to

So Tara's point, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that the project in the incubation phase is expected to have a growth plan. The idea here is that there should be a consensus and transparency

I'm a little late to the party as I was on vacation. Looks like this topic needs more discussion before we call a vote. I hear the point from Andy & Tara that, in my understanding, basically boils

+1 binding --

-1 binding (as a 'defer' not a 'deny') To Andy's point, I also feel like we need better details and transparency around the goals of the existing projects so that we can quantify how any new projects

This proposed edit makes sense to me. From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...>On Behalf Of Michael Winser via Lists.Cd.Foundation Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 5:49 PM To: cdf-toc@... Subject: Re:

+1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has

+1 binding -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi