Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 15 mins from now to be exact: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit --

And I'm obviously also a +1 binding on this, given that I wrote it :) That leaves us with 6 votes in favor, so this should be good to go! Thanks everyone. Dan Lorenc

Hi all, We are ramping up to CD Summit North America which will be in San Diego on Monday November 18th. Christie Wilson & I will be co-chairing the program committee and we would like some folks to

So Tara's point, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that the project in the incubation phase is expected to have a growth plan. The idea here is that there should be a consensus and transparency

I'm a little late to the party as I was on vacation. Looks like this topic needs more discussion before we call a vote. I hear the point from Andy & Tara that, in my understanding, basically boils

+1 binding --

-1 binding (as a 'defer' not a 'deny') To Andy's point, I also feel like we need better details and transparency around the goals of the existing projects so that we can quantify how any new projects

This proposed edit makes sense to me.

+1 non binding I would suggest a future edit to change "Durations for a Working Groups should be <6 months" to "Durations for a Working Groups must be <6 months" I think that once a working group has

+1 binding -- Kohsuke Kawaguchi

+1 binding -- Tara Hernandez Engineering Manager Google Cloud

+1 non binding. I saw the screwdriver presentation and it looked really impressive. After the fundamentals are agreed upon I think it could be a great asset.

+1 non-binding -- Zhao Xiaojie (Rick) Blog: https://github.com/LinuxSuRen Twitter: https://twitter.com/suren69811254

+1 binding. -- Andrew Glover Director of Delivery Engineering Netflix, Inc.

I am a -1. We (the CDF TOC) haven't (yet) formalized an interoperability plan/strategy for the existing member projects. I think we should clarify how all these projects fit together for the benefit

Got it. Thanks. :-) +1 non-binding

As an example, you can reply "+1 non-binding" if you aren't on the TOC and "+1 binding" if you are on the TOC. In your case, "+1 non-binding" or -1 "non-binding" would work :) -- Chris Aniszczyk

I think I may have missed something. What is the process for voting? (Sorry if this is a newbie question.)

The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/21 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do

The screwdriver.cd project has been formally proposed for inclusion in the CDF. The proposal information can be found here: https://github.com/cdfoundation/toc/pull/22 And the team's presentation to