Kay: Gotcha, thanks for the clarification So, if I'm understanding it correctly the diff between working groups (shorter term, finer granularity efforts) and SIGs (longer term, broader standards

It may not be too much more to bite off? The CNCF SIG model feels well thought out. Perhaps we can adopt it with little more than a search/replace from CNCF -> CDF. From: cdf-toc@...

I broadly agree with the "two-tier" model and should have made that more clear in my proposal. k8s (and more recently the CNCF) splits these up into "working groups" and "special interest groups",

I am not sure if we want/need to define all the top-level items for now. I just threw out some items as possible examples. The larger question is the two-tier structure. From: cdf-toc@...

"Deployment" is pretty broad, I worry that such a group would be working with a LOT of conditionals, e.g. on-prem vs cloud, service vs. serverless, maybe even baremetal vs. VM/Container (sadly

What would folks think about following a two tiered model? Top-Tier The top tier would be a more formal, long-running structure along logical, functional areas of need. This would be similar to

Hey All, This topic has come up a few times since kicking off the CDF TOC, and I promised to put together a proposal on the lifecycle of working groups. I got a doc started here. I'd appreciate any

Thanks. My interpretation of this in plain English is that "bottom line, don't worry, we are not impacted."-- Kohsuke Kawaguchi

I just wanted to make the broader CDF community aware

Thanks for starting this discussion Travis. I added it to the agenda for next week, Tuesday the 18th. Dan Lorenc

Primarily directed at CDF TOC, but obviously Spinnaker (and Tekton and Jenkins) stakeholders are more than welcome to join in the discussion.-- Travis Tomsu | Software Engineer | ttomsu@... |

Friendly ping... Any thoughts or opinions on this? Would it be a bad idea to add this to the next TOC agenda? Travis-- Travis Tomsu | Software Engineer | ttomsu@... | 614-205-9258

Hi CDF & Spinnaker governance committees, I'd like to kickstart the conversation about how we track project-level metrics across the CDF. Specifically, I'm interested in instrumenting Spinnaker

Great chatting with everyone yesterday. One more note on CoC stuff. Otter Tech does training for CoC enforcement. Since this is something that is infrequent but highly important to get right, that

I thought they are recorded. I'll check this time. I think the question is worth digging deeper. If we are asking the projects for a status update, that'd be seen as a pointless work. I'm sure we all

I am not going to be able to attend today's meeting, so just sharing some thoughts here. (Side note: has there been any thought to start recording these meetings?) As far as inter-project - is there a

Cool! Here's some discussion that I'd like to have. Maybe more on the email list than in a meeting today, but here it goes. With the new project acceptance criteria in place, I feel like our shop is

I'll be unable to make the meeting today as I'm traveling. I want to give a quick update though, decisively that I'm starting work on a proposal around CDF working groups. Dan Lorenc

Today is our TOC regular TOC meeting. 6 hours from now to be exact: https://zoom.us/my/cdf.toc The agenda is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBHar55fTInWF9Li4t0lyG3tTC8BRLU0FfBfsgk_Jrs/edit --

Yoav, This is an honor. Welcome! { "regards" : { "name" : “marky”, "phone" : "+1 (408) 464 2965”, "email" : “marky.r.jackson@...", "team" :