Re: [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs


Kay Williams <kayw@...>
 

Got it. Thanks. :-)

 

+1 non-binding

 

From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 1:25 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: Re: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs

 

As an example, you can reply "+1 non-binding" if you aren't on the TOC and "+1 binding" if you are on the TOC.

 

In your case, "+1 non-binding" or -1 "non-binding" would work :)

 

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 2:50 PM Kay Williams via Lists.Cd.Foundation <kayw=microsoft.com@...> wrote:

I think I may have missed something. What is the process for voting? (Sorry if this is a newbie question.)

 

From: cdf-toc@... <cdf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Dan Lorenc via Lists.Cd.Foundation
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2019 12:10 PM
To: cdf-toc@...
Subject: [CDF Technical Oversight Committee] [VOTE] Working Groups and SIGs

 

The working group and SIG process proposal is ready for a vote. The full proposal can be found here:

 

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

Dan Lorenc


 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Join cdf-toc@lists.cd.foundation to automatically receive all group messages.